Asset management information you can defend.
An independent review of your asset register, condition data and lifecycle assumptions, ending in the valuations, renewal forecasts and asset management plans that stand up to audit, community, and scrutiny.
The register says one thing. The ground says another.
Most asset registers were built once, inherited twice and patched ever since. That's survivable until someone asks you to justify a renewal number, and the evidence trail runs out.
What we actually do.
Scoped to your asset classes and the decision you need to defend, not a fixed package.
Register review
Completeness, hierarchy, componentisation and data quality reviewed against a defined standard, with the gaps listed by materiality.
Condition data
The rating method, scale and sampling defined, the inspection program scoped and procured, and the returned data verified before it drives a decision.
Lifecycle & renewal modelling
Useful lives, criticality, deterioration and intervention points modelled to produce a long-run renewal profile.
Capital forecasting
A 10 to 20 year forecast tied line by line to the evidence behind it, reconciled to valuation and ready for the long-term financial plan.
Asset management plans
AMP and SAMP drafting or refresh, written to be used: levels of service, risk, lifecycle and funding in one thread.
Handover & uplift
The method documented so your team runs the next cycle without us. That's the point.
The method, applied.
Discover · establish the truth on the ground
Extract and profile the register, interview the people who maintain the assets, and define how any field verification is scoped and sampled. You get an evidence-based picture of what you own before anyone models anything.
Analyse · turn condition into consequence
Apply consistent lives and deterioration curves, model risk and criticality, and test the renewal profile against different funding scenarios.
Advise · build the case
Priorities, trade-offs and the funding case, framed for the audience that has to approve it. Every figure traceable back to its source.
Implement · make it stick
Load the corrected data, document the method, and train your team to repeat the cycle. Optional annual health check.
What you're left holding.
A register you can stand behind
Complete, consistent and evidenced, with the gaps that remain named and priced rather than hidden.
A forecast that survives scrutiny
Renewal and capital numbers with a documented line back to condition data and assumptions.
A plan people use
An AMP that guides the capital program instead of sitting beside it.
Bring us the register you're least confident about.
A short conversation is usually enough to tell you whether it's a data problem, a method problem or a funding problem.